Tag: writer-review

This tag identifies blogs tagged by writer Cortni Merritt related to reviews and discussion of techniques of famous writers.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Write like Great Classic Authors: Ernest Hemingway

Ernest Hemingway, beloved among American classic authors
 

“Write the truest sentence you know.” Then do it again. One sentence at a time, you write your story. Classic authors knew that there was nothing like capturing and keeping a reader’s attention, and titan in the literary world, Ernest Hemingway, knew and performed this trick better than most. 

Known for his concise, powerful prose, Hemingway’s advice to write one true sentence at a time encapsulates the essence of his approach to storytelling—one that hinges on the authenticity of every sentence.

In the world of Hemingway, the narrative unfolds one sentence at a time. Sentences pull the reader along, like links in a chain, to the conclusion, toward the truth. Truth is elusive and can change from sentence to sentence, but if a writer focuses on making each sentence true, the reader will be pulled along. Every writer, (yes, even the classic authors), desires the command of readers’ attention. 

By crafting each sentence with a commitment to truth, the writer threads truth throughout the entire tale.

Black and white photo of classic authors Ernest Hemingway sitting at desk with mountains in the background
For more about the life of Ernest Hemingway, visit the Hemingway House website

How Do I Write Like Hemingway?

To write like Hemingway, focus on simplicity and brevity. Use short, direct sentences and avoid unnecessary details. Embrace the “show, don’t tell” principle, allowing readers to infer meaning from the narrator’s descriptions, character’s expressions or movements, or vague dialogue. 

Develop a keen observation of life and draw inspiration from your experiences. Consider keeping a creative scrapbook and collecting quotes, thoughts, notes, and ideas from authentic experiences you have in real life. Hemingway’s writing incorporates a deep understanding of human emotions, so use real emotions and behaviors you see in the world as inspiration for honest emotional resonance in your writing.

How Do I Edit like Hemingway?

You can also keep this commitment to truth in mind when editing. Hone your editing skills to eliminate redundant or flowery language. Remember that every sentence should be able to stand true on its own. Every sentence should contain something that moves the story forward and keeps the reader engaged. Otherwise, does the story need it? If there’s no truth or value in the sentence, can it be cut? 

Classic authors invested less time in editing than they did in writing, because, when writing everything by hand, they were often more likely to decide on their word before committing it to paper. In today’s world of Backspace and Delete All functions, you may find yourself spending more time editing than Hemingway would have. Technology makes both writing and editing simpler than ever before.

Classic Authors Were People, Too

Of course, Hemingway’s life and work are not without controversy. In particular, his portrayal of women was *ahem* questionable (and certainly never passes the Bechdel Test). I am not the first to criticize him for being stereotypical, limited, and reflecting traditional gender roles. Like any author, his perspective is limited, and his version of the truth in the world is biased. 

But take from him what you can and build a brighter future. 

As you hone your craft as a writer, let this spark of wisdom from one of the great American classic authors serve as a guiding light. Hemingway’s words of wisdom can be a reminder that every sentence should bear the weight of truth. Remember that each sentence not only contributes to the story’s progression but also must captivate and enchant the reader.

If you want to write with a similar brilliance to Hemingway, don’t forget how important it is to develop your own style and voice. Be brief. Wield words with precision and impact. But know that Hemingway is asking you to do more than that: he asks you to deliver profound truths in the most economical manner. Let your sentences resonate, reverberating with the authenticity of human experience.

Ready to talk to an editor?

Contact SRD Editing Services
Posted on by — Leave a comment

Proofreading for University Reports: Editor Cortni & Keiser University Vice Chancellor Discuss Academic Writing & Editing

Colored sticky notes, pens, and markers used to keep organization in academic writing

As a writing and editing professional, editor Cortni Merritt is sometimes asked to consult and collaborate on a variety of academic, technical, and business writing projects in addition to her projects with SRD Editing Services as a member of other groups not associated with SRD Editing Services. Recently she was honored by the request to participate in a crucial academic writing project at Keiser University in Florida. 

As an accredited institution, the University is required to assemble a comprehensive compliance report for the accreditation board every five years, and as a professional familiar with academic editing, Cortni was asked to assist with proofreading and finalizing the report before its submission to the board.

“The need for an editor isn’t about a lack of ability on the part of the writer; instead, it’s about a division of labor. When it absolutely has to be right, we will use a team approach.”

The Big Picture: Proofreading a Year-Long Collaboration

In the spring of 2022, Cortni introduced herself to the accreditation report writing team at Keiser University, composed of faculty, staff, deans, and experts in higher education writing and documentation. The timeline was laid out: Over the upcoming 12 months, teams of primary and secondary content developers would submit their materials to a compliance committee, and only after all materials’ content had been finalized would Cortni be asked to review and proofread for technical accuracy, using a KU-specific style sheet, based on combined elements from the Chicago Manual of Style and the APA Publication Manual. 

The final report to be submitted to the accreditation board in spring of 2023 was estimated to total around100 pages of narrative essays with 200 more pages of additional supporting documentation, which would not be subject to the proofreading process. However, Cortni was informed that there may be additional front matter, back matter, and appendices that might also need editing. 

Needless to say, it was quite the challenge! But if there’s one thing Cortni loves as an editor, it’s a new challenge. 

Associate Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs, Dr. Michael Record, located at the University’s flagship campus in West Palm Beach, Florida, was lead project manager for the entire team of contributors, including Cortni from her office in Orlando, Florida. After the report was submitted and the project complete, Dr. Record generously shared his post-project insights about academic writing, professional editing and proofreading, and project management with Cortni in the following interview transcript.

Process, Standards, & Style: SRD Editor Interviews Dr. Michael Record

The following is compiled from multiple conversations in May 2023. Content is compressed and edited for clarity, organization, and story; some identifying information is redacted to protect confidentiality.  

Cortni Merritt: Well, Dr. Record! We finally reached the end of this large group project.  This involved so many highly educated specialists and subject matter experts. How many people were involved in the report writing (with all the writers, reviewers, committee members, advisors, etc.)?

Michael Record: Indeed! A big project. We had approximately 30 secondary developers writing on behalf of approximately 15 primary developers submitting their drafts to a compliance committee of approximately 20 people. Given a little bit of overlap in these appointments, I would say 60 folks contributed. 

For clarity, I’ll add that the chancellor and his management team [at the flagship Florida campus] served as primary developers of content…secondary developers did most of the writing on behalf of [their] vice chancellors. In most cases, [the report writing teams] would run their narrative by the primary developer for approval before submitting it to the compliance committee. 

CM: And after the compliance committee approval, it was sent to Cortni for final proofreading? 

MR: Well, that was the original idea. But, unofficially, we found a lack of quality in what was submitted…so the compliance committee chairperson and I—I have served on several on-site reaffirmation committees—with the assistance of the [lead] editor, who has served as a reviewer on accreditation teams, did a lot of rewriting…and then it would get sent to Cortni for proofreading, eventually.

CM: So the report went through a lead editor and a proofreader in addition to all the writing, rewriting, and review, is that right…?

MR: We had a [lead editor] who spent probably 40 hours. Would you estimate your contributions as proofreader at 25 hours?  

CM: Yes, about that. Maybe 30…how many hours do you think went into preparing this report in total? 

MR: That is difficult to estimate, but here’s my thinking: each team of 3-5 secondary developers would probably spend an average of three hours per person developing, reviewing, and gathering documents. A rough estimate for the secondary development [is] 330 hours.  

At the compliance committee, let’s say another 240 hours. And, I would ballpark the same for the time spent by the compliance committee chair, me (as project manager), and about 30 for the vice chancellor, bringing the total to somewhere in the neighborhood of 750 staff hours. 

CM: Wow. I think that goes to show that it takes a lot of preparation and preliminary work in a writing project—really, any academic writing project but especially one this size. So many people think that the first draft is the last draft, but there’s unseen steps for development, revision, and rewriting…all before editing even starts!…Since so many of the contributors were experienced writers, did it seem like “overkill” having both an editor and a proofreader? The copy must have been pretty clean to begin with.

MR: Well, people who don’t understand the publishing process don’t realize that the need for an editor isn’t about a lack of ability on the part of the writer; instead, it’s about a division of labor. When it absolutely has to be right, we will use a team approach.  

I can share my surprise at learning that the final report that gets handed in by the committee to the accrediting agency is almost completely narrative. For each standard, one does ultimately “check” whether the institution is in compliance, partial compliance, or noncompliance…however, that is followed by analytical narrative. 

In other words, a compliance report is ultimately a Word document. There is no way to summarize or digest an institution’s compliance with the standards of an accrediting body. Lengthy academic reports ultimately determine the continued good standing of an  institution in an accrediting body, meaning the quality of writing matters significantly. 

[And that’s why it’s important to understand] the capability of your team and your report writers. In some cases, the folks generating the copy were not academics, [but] it is not necessarily a good assumption that an academic [writer] will produce copy appropriate for [this type of specialized academic] report, even if that individual is an accomplished scholar with lots of publications on his or her vita. 

Quick example: it’s shocking how many ways of styling the name of a degree a group of university faculty and administrators can come up with: master degree…masters degree…master’s degree…Master’s of Science…Master of Science…Masters in Science…Masters Degree of Science…Masters of Science Degree…

It was impossible for the project manager—me!—to know how often a certain convention was going to be used, and whether it was going to be used often enough to require a rule governing it. Some of the best contributions you made as proofreader on the project were identifying issues that weren’t even addressed by the style sheet but needed to be. 

CM: Well, thank you. It was my pleasure. I’m glad I could help.

MR: You did! The main change in the process of editing is the ongoing development of the style sheet. Some organizations may have a style sheet that never changes or changes very seldom. A higher education institution that writes high-stakes accreditation reports every five years has a style sheet that is going to change a lot. 

With [more] issues identified, the next generation of developers is going to have even better guidance on what to do during drafting to lighten the load of the editor. Having a sufficient trove of issues identified along with advice about how to handle those issues makes generating the report a much easier task.  

You know, generally, division of labor based on experience makes everything easier. 

In this case, some people’s contribution [was] to conceive of the message, some people’s contribution [was] to write the copy, some people’s contribution [was] to gather evidentiary documentation, some people’s contribution [was] to evaluate and revise, and some persons’ jobs [were] to proofread and edit. When no one person is responsible for all of that, everyone can devote himself or herself to his or her own specific task, only do that, and do it really well. 

CM: That’s brilliant. Have experts focus on their areas of expertise.

MR: [That is why editing and proofreading were] important enough to be [their] own discrete stage of the report development process. Similar to when I wrote my doctoral dissertation and needed a professional editor even though the work I did for the institution at the time was similar to that of a professional editor, we needed an editor for this project who was not a developer—someone whose responsibility was not to write, or even necessarily to think about the institution’s compliance with the standards—because we wanted someone designated to handle the surface-level correctness of language.   

Had I to do it over again, I would start sooner and have a third phase (beyond primary and secondary [report writers]) whose job would be only to determine whether or not we were operating in compliance with the standard, but not necessarily to produce any copy. Then I would have a hand-off to the secondary developers who would take the information learned during that phase and write about it. 

CM: A great idea for next time, right? We’ve been talking about the “standards” and “compliance” with them, which brings me to a more technical question about the report writing—what were these “standards” that the University had to comply with? What was the real purpose of this compliance report? 

MR: Well, there were 22 academic standards–areas in which the University must demonstrate excellence in order to retain our accreditation. We have to prove—through explanatory narratives and evidenciary documents—that we have comparable facilities, classes, instructors, staff, policies, educational materials, etc., to similar institutions in Florida and throughout the southeastern US. 

So my primary purpose was getting an answer to the question “Do we comply with these 22 standards?” Our emphasis was [on providing] clear and complete answers. We hear a lot [at academic writers’ conferences, trainings, and seminars] about institutions that demonstrate compliance with part of the standard or what people’s impression of the standard is. 

Our approach in this report writing…was to break each standard into clauses, turn each clause into a subheading [in the report], and clearly demonstrate compliance with the clause of the standard within that subheading.

Beyond that, our focus was self-examination. Most institutions focus so much in their report writing on demonstrating compliance that they lose sight of the opportunity to learn about themselves. 

CM: What a fascinating, yet straightforward, process. Sounds like you basically reverse-engineered an outline for the report and created writing prompts for each section. 

MR: Exactly! 

CM: And so, what’s one piece of advice you’ll share? Something you think writing project managers ought to know?  

MR: The best advice I can share for working with a large team of content specialists is to acknowledge that just because someone is accomplished in a particular field of scholarship doesn’t mean that individual knows technical writing. 

In this context, all that means is answering the question that was asked, answering it completely, answering it clearly, and providing all the evidence the reader needs to believe the answer. 

The best specific tip I can offer is to take that team of academic writers through a series of examples and nonexamples of successful [report] writing. It can be enormously instructive to show teams of writers samples of well-written narratives that don’t answer the question, don’t provide evidence, or aren’t complete. This is an experiential approach to discriminating between good writing that demonstrates compliance and good writing that doesn’t demonstrate compliance. 

CM: As an editor, I can see how I would apply that advice to all types of large writing projects—book manuscripts, academic articles, business websites, etc. Thank you so much for sharing that wisdom!  

So, I have one final question for you, Dr. Record. I’ve seen a post online that suggests that it’s time for academia to replace “et al.” with “and besties” in citations. So instead of “Smith et al.,” citations would become “Smith and besties.” What are your thoughts on this?  

MR: That’s cute, and while it’s a joke, it’s actually a great teaching strategy. Instructors don’t acknowledge the subvocalization process often enough. When people read, their brains “pronounce” the words, and when our students don’t know how to pronounce something, they skip it—or they get frustrated and stop working. When I taught in Florida classrooms, I always taught students very intentionally how to read college-level material. I taught them to subvocalize “Smith (2022) observed…” as “Smith in 2022 observed…” As simple as that teaching behavior was, it was the difference between a group of emerging scholars warming up to academic discourse versus feeling alienated by it. I taught academic writers to read “Smith et al.” as “Smith and others,” but I will be using “Smith and besties” from now on. 

Cortni Merritt, SRD Editing Services & Academic Writing & Editing Projects

As an experienced proofreader, academic editor, and writing project manager in Florida, Cortni is always expanding her areas of expertise. This experience proofreading materials for Keiser University was one of many in the realms of business and technical writing and editing projects that was recently on Cortni’s calendar, but you can expect SRD Editing Services to be involved in similar University projects in 2023 and 2024. 

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Writers Talking Writing: TV Writer Shonda Rhimes’s Tips to Lay Track

Cover of book by TV writer Shonda Rhimes titled "Year of Yes"

Lessons on Life from a TV Writer

Earlier this year, I listened to the audiobook for Shonda Rhimes’s Year of Yes, a successful and interesting TV writer with decades of experience (if you don’t know who she is.) In this mix of memoir and self-help advice, both funny and touching, Rhimes shares her wisdom about how to embrace personal growth and new opportunities.

You must open your mind to new opportunities and experiences in order to overcome stagnation and truly grow. Nothing new will happen to you if you don’t say “yes” to anything new. If you want to break free from the constraints of the familiar and mundane, Rhimes argues, you must be open to the unknown.

The book is particularly relatable for writers, mothers, and Black women—and even if you are not all of those things, you may be able to relate to her clear and insightful revelations about her experiences as an introvert. I could relate! I understood exactly what she was talking about when she said she was fine fading into the background, although she obviously had a larger-than-life personality.

Lay Track like a TV Writer

One striking metaphor Rhimes employs in the book compares writing for successful TV shows to laying down train tracks, and even non-TV writers can relate. Shonda describes how she knew the train was coming; the production schedule must run on time. She details her intense feelings of pressure to keep the schedule on track. She knows she can be flattened by that train.

To help her maintain focus and meet her writing goals (while avoiding being overwhelmed by industry demands), Rhimes lays out 6 tips on “how to lay track” as a TV writer. Even if you’re not a writer for a big, successful TV series (or three!), try these out to see if they can help you be more focused and productive in your own writing process.

  1. Establish a routine. A daily routine provides structure and can help you stay disciplined, focused, and productive. Designate times to complete your writing, whether you write for a specific period of time or until you reach a certain word count; it’s the consistency of sitting down to write at the same time that can help.
  2. Set clear deadlines. Clear, nonnegotiable deadlines create a sense of urgency and can help motivate you to meet your goals. In the case that you’re working on a collaborative project (like a TV show), deadlines for yourself will help you do your part to ensure everyone’s timelines stay on track.
  3. Say “no.” It can be difficult, of course, because we want to say “yes” to all the good, entertaining, pleasing things in our lives—like time with family and indulging in trips to restaurants and other places away from our desks—but if those opportunities are not aligned with your goals, they can derail your focus. To meet your deadlines, you will have to say “no” to some things and prioritize your work.
  4. Embrace productive procrastination. To be at your most creative, you need the space to brainstorm and think, so not all procrastination is bad procrastination. Sometimes, letting your mind wander allows you to come up with something great, new, and creative. So allow yourself to take a break if it helps you be your creative best.
  5. Accountability. Do you have a team that holds you accountable? Or even just one single “accountability-buddy”? Get one. Whether it’s your partner, your kids, your colleagues, or the rest of your writing team, use the power of positive peer pressure to help you make steady progress and deliver on your commitments.
  6. Create a dedicated workspace. This should be a sort of “sacred” writing space for you. A space where you can be your most productive, feel free to think, and that helps you envision yourself as a successful, competent, productive writer. Set up an area that helps you feel comfortable, but not too relaxed, and ready to work.

In addition to these tips on how to successfully lay track in your writing, Rhimes also discusses some of the less glamorous aspects of being a TV writer, such as the eye strain (and necessary eye care for writers) that comes from staring at a screen for long hours and the weight gain that can occur if you maintain a sedentary lifestyle and don’t balance laying track in your writing with actual movement of your body. And in all her discussions about these real-world writerly topics, Rhimes remains funny as hell.

More Life Lessons

If you’re not familiar with Rhimes’s work, do yourself a favor and try this book on for size. You’ll find some heartwarming lessons about navigating physical, mental, and emotional challenges, particularly those faced by a successful TV writer. No matter what other self-help books you’ve read, you’ll find in Year of Yes an inspirational message about embracing your own paths of growth and self-love.

Contact SRD Editing Services

Are you a TV writer ready to talk to an editor?

Posted on by — 4 Comments

Top 5 Books of 2022

Neon sign in purple, pink, and blue that reads "top 5" indicating top 5 books read and reviewed in 2022

The SRD Editor List of Favorite Books Read in 2022

As an avid reader, I’ve been on Goodreads for years. I love being able to track what books I read and share with others the ones I feel most strongly about. In 2022, I began listening to audiobooks that I borrow from my local library on the Libby by Overdrive app. I love it! I have a commute. I have to cook dinner. I can’t always be sitting with my nose in a book, but I can (almost) always be listening to a  book while doing something else. I’m hooked! 

So in 2022, I borrowed 68 audiobooks from my library. Although Goodreads shows I read 88 books, it counted some story or essay collections separately (Sherlock Holmes and Karl Marx, in particular). Plus, I also read a couple physical books that made their way into Goodreads. So I probably read about 75-ish total. 

Don’t ask me to pick a single favorite! I might blow a circuit trying to figure it out. 

But I have narrowed it down to a *few* of my top recommendations. 

After I finished these audiobooks last year, I posted about them to my personal Facebook circle. So below, you’ll find that original, casual review. But, as a bonus, because I professionally write book reviews as well, I’ve included a bit more of a comprehensive review in this blog. I also tag the books I read to keep track of genres, so I’ve included those below as well. 

Warning: Spoilers ahead!

These book reviews may contain some details that could affect your reading of the book. I’ve tried not to give away too much, however. 

Oh! And connect with me on Goodreads! I love to add to my “Want to Read” list when I see my connections recommend a book! 

This page contains affiliate links. SRD Editing Services may receive a commission if you purchase a product through one of our affiliate links. Thank you!

Little Fires Everywhere

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
By: Celeste Ng
 
This started as a slow burn for me. Probably wasn’t really until the end of Chapter 2 before I was interested but I was hooked by the end of Chapter 10. I kind of always wanted to be Mia, but I was probably actually Izzy. But at least I never burned the house down. 🔥😁
 
This story is especially pertinent now, in the wake of over turning Roe v. Wade. 
Book cover for Little Fires Everywhere by Celeste Ng

 It’s about mothering, motherhood, and who “qualifies” as a mother — which, mothering was central to my Master’s thesis, btw. If this book has been published when i was writing my thesis, i would have used it. It has so much to say.

It’s set in the 90s, just a couple years ahead of my own life and social development.

I remember pretty much everything mentioned but i remember it as a child. Reading about the events as an adult is different. Strikingly, painfully different now that i know what happened after 2001. The world can never be the way it was in the 90s. You can never go home again.
 
Especially after you’ve burned it to the ground. 🔥 Great job, Izzy. Well done.

Extended Review...

“Motherhood” is composed of many decisions, daily, and it presents in many different ways. This story gave an interesting analysis of different types of mothers, what “mothering” can look like, and what makes a truly excellent mother. There’s a contrast between the suburban, idyllic mother, who embodies many of the stereotypes sold on TV as ideal mothering, a birth-mother who gives up her daughter for adoption due to temporary struggles and the adoptive mother who doesn’t want to give the daughter back when the birth-mother asks for her, and a surrogate mother who, during pregnancy, realized she did not want to give up the chance to be a mother and who steals the baby from the couple she is surrogating for. All of these women are flawed; all of these women define themselves as mothers, although their priorities and approaches are vastly different. 

The definition and portrayals of mothers changed vastly in the 1990s, the time period for the story, and the book faces those challenges with grit and heart. In a decade when women were fighting to institute a more fair and truly family-friendly approach to motherhood, women seemed to also be fighting each other over who was entitled to those motherhood rights. Which is unfortunate, and perhaps the women of today’s generation can examine if, and how, gendered treatment of one another has changed. From “mean girls” to “mean moms,” how is today’s generation approaching the community of sorority differently? I’m not sure the book answers these questions, but to pose them for examination is one of the first challenges, and the story certainly makes a display of the importance of these ponderings. 

Tagged: women’s lit, 21st century lit, mom lit, movie

Readers should be aware of sensitive content including sexual activity in teenagers, destruction of property, and discussions of abortion. 

Kitchen Confidential

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
By: Anthony Bourdain
Read by the author

Everyone should read this book. Everyone. If you’ve ever worked at a restaraunt, known someone who works in a kitchen, eaten at a restauraunt, or plan to eat at a restaurant. EVERYONE.

Foul-mouthed. Fast-paced. Full of life.

Book cover for Kitchen Confidential by Anthony Bourdain

Sure he talks a bit about his life. But what he regails in elegant prose and sharp-tongued truth is kitchen life. Who you’ll meet in a kitchen. How you’ll grow. And the grit it really takes to run a great restaurant.

Now, this book is old. Pre-food network glory days. But it’s destined to be a classic of nonfiction prose. One for the ages.

RIP. 💔

Extended Review...

As someone who worked in kitchens (fast food and delis) as a teenager, I felt a deep connection and identification with Bourdain’s content. And as a frequent reader of memoir, I found this to be a unique description more about the actions and lessons learned in his life than the events of it, which was not only refreshing but insightful and helpful thanks to his practical advice and world-wise perspective. 

Tagged: memoir, funny, 21st century lit, science

Readers should be aware of sensitive content including adult language and drug use. 

The Giver of Stars

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
By: Jojo Moyes

5 glowing stars.

Excellent. A place I’ve never been before (Depression-era Kentucky), full of characters with unique voices, and a story I’ve never heard before. One in which gritty librarians are the heroes. Full of #girlpower. Honestly, I’m not sure if it gets better than this.

Book cover for The Giver of Stars by Jojo Moyes. Shows an image of a mountainside in sunrise.

There’s a lot of debate in writer communities about prologues. Are they good? Bad? Necessary? Annoying?

To offer a little *spoiler*: I think the prologue in this book is crucial. 

You couldn’t cut it. It’d be an entirely different story. That’s all I’ll say about that. 🤐

I’ll be checking out more from this author. ❤️

Extended Review...

There’s always something I appreciate when reading about characters who are dirt poor. I mean, stuffing holes in the cracks in the wall to keep out the cold, no shoes in frozen ground, bathes once a year in a hot bath, seasons broth with tree bark, live off the land, dirt poor. It feels more real somehow, more urgent, than reading about characters whose lives are full of diamonds and satins and warm fires in gilded fireplaces. Maybe it just makes me appreciate living in moderate comfort in modern times, but it feels more approachable. 

In particular, I love to read about the lives of “everyday” or common women in the past. Even if they are fictitious. The lives of the rich and famous, the lives of aristocrats and social figures is nice and all — queens are certainly fabulous — but there’s something simultaneously sweet and raw in reading about peasant women whose lives didn’t have a huge impact but whose stories are larger than life. 

So maybe that’s why I loved this book so much. Because I love when I get to connect with women from the past and see all the ways in which their lives might be similar to my own. 

Tagged: historical lit, women’s lit, romance

Readers may need to be made aware of sensitive content including adult language, death/murder, and physical abuse of women/children.

Atomic Habits

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
By: James Clear

I could give this 10 stars. Remarkable. Genuinely a book that I think everyone could benefit from. Clear breaks down some of the most useful and successful concepts in cognitive behavioral therapy into practical, applicable advice. Want to implement a good habit? There’s a trick for that. Want to break or replace a bad habit? There’s advice for that. Not too technical or full of jargon. An approachable self-help manual to improve any area of your life. I cannot recommend this book enough. I may actually buy a physical copy for myself and everyone i know. ❤️

Book cover for Atomic Habits by James Clear

Extended Review...

As someone who has read extensively into psychology topics, I love the idea of behavior modification through proven/easy-to-implement techniques. In particular, I love how simple Clear makes this. He doesn’t say it will be easy, but he does help readers make it as easy as possible. 

Some of these concepts I was familiar with and have used before, such as “habit stacking,” which is when you build on one habit by attaching another to it. For example, if you have a medication you need to take every morning, you attach it to something that’s part of your existing routine, like brushing your teeth. Brush your teeth. Take the medicine. Stack one habit on another to make your routine easier and optimize your habit building. 

Clear focuses on behaviors, and although he touches a bit on the “cognitive” part of cognitive behavioral therapy, he keeps the focus on the manageable actions. I think that’s best for most people. Some people need a deeper dive into their thoughts and changing their thought patterns to have better control over their behaviors, but most people mainly need the awareness of the behavior in the first place in order to initiate change. 

Clear makes the topic easy and guilt-free. It’s a solutions-first approach rather than heavy on analytical techniques or digging into the “why,” and that’s why I think it’s so successful and approachable for so many people. 

Tagged: self-help, psychology

There is no sensitive content readers should be aware of. 

Damned

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
By Chuck Palahniuk

Alrighty then. Picture this if you will: A 13 year old girl with the personality of Tyler Durden has died of a marijuana overdose and gone to hell. 🔥 She becomes the weirdo freak character in a twisted version of the Breakfast Club and together, she and a group of fellow misfits relive a rendition of Dante’s Inferno, where she works a call center reminiscent of the Sorry to Bother You movie, then squares off against the most evil characters in world history to live the most wacky and triumphant afterlife imaginable. 😈

Cover of the novel "Damned" by Chuck Palahniuk. Shows a red devil face on a brown background.

This might be my favorite book I’ve listened to this year. Wild. Self-righteous. Zany. Completely unhinged. Disgusting. Hilarious. Sharp and sardonic. I don’t know how else to describe Palahniuk.

If you’ve never read any Palahniuk before, this isn’t the worst place to start. But just know, you may think you’re losing your mind, and you may also love every damned minute of it.

Extended Review...

Chuck Palahniuk has become synonymous with weird, building a legacy on his twisted tales that take the reader places they’ve likely never been before. And although male writers often err when writing female characters, Palahniuk has found a way to channel the sarcasm, biting critiques, and attitude of outraged angst so typical in his characters into a perfectly believable teenage girl. 

One of the elements that contributes to Palahniuk’s success in his craft is his ability to handle unreliable narrators. Here, the narrator either is insecure and embarrassed, lying to give a better impression while knowing she’s unreliable. Or, she starts off in denial of her situation, and it is only after she faces the unique and tragic circumstances that got her to hell can she be relied upon (either by the reader or other characters). I’ll let you be the judge. 

However, once she empowers herself with the truth, her redemption/revenge arc is an extraordinary adventure.

Tagged: 21st century lit, adventure, women’s lit, fantasy, funny, horror

Readers should be warned about sensitive content including adult language, self-harm and suicide, drug use, and sexual activity among teenagers.  

Honorable Mention

The Book Eaters
By Sunyi Dean
⭐⭐⭐⭐

Tagged: adventure, women’s lit, 21st century lit, Mom lit, LGBTQ, horror, sci-fi

4.5 stars. In a world where some people consume and grow from literature and some people consume and grow from others’ minds, how does a mother protect and care for children who are seen as monsters and who can quickly become monsters? 📚

I loved this. Every minute of it. The prose is gripping and the plot takes several unexpected twists. Including how Lgbtqia+ this book is (it’s the first book I’ve read this year with a character who self-identifies as ace.)🏳️‍🌈

Part Handmaid’s Tale, part Frankenstein, mixed into a new nightmare. 🧟‍♀️

The ending isn’t what i expected either. And i liked that. It *doesnt* tie up with a nice bow, and what could be more true-to-life?

The audiobook ended with a lovely conversation between the author and the audiobook narrator, which was so interesting and different. As a publishing professional, i love that kind of industry insider content. 😊 

The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo
By Taylor Jenkins Reid
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Tagged: women’s lit, 21st century lit, LGBTQ, romance, funny, movie

If you’ve heard anything about this book, I think it will come as no surprise that I found it extraordinary. What a romance! I cried real tears. Simply heart wrenching and inspiring with an excellent twist at the end. 🙌

I know Evelyn is blonde, but I kept picturing her as Katherine Hepburn or Lauren Bacall. Maybe with a dash of Marilyn Monroe mixed in. Elegant and lovely. Sharp witted. Classy and poised like golden Hollywood always presented itself. A true icon. 👗👠

I can’t say i “liked” Evelyn. But i really loved her. And i won’t say that Celia was perfect, but she was damn sure close. And Harry! Who wouldn’t love Harry? ❤️

I loved the alternating between past and present timelines, with the occassional insert from the gossip columns so we could see how things looked from the outside.

I was on the wait list for this book. Twice. For a total of 5 months. And i devoured it in 2 days. It was well worth the wait and impossible to put down.

Netflix is making a movie, and I see people online concerned that Netflix will “sterilize” the story and focus on only Evelyn’s seven husbands and not her wife. I agree. I really, really hope they don’t do that. 😬

Run, don’t walk, to check this out for yourself.

The Last House on Needless Street
By Catriona Ward
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Tagged: 21st century lit, LGBTQ, psychology, horror

It should be no surprise that a thriller with a blurb from Stephen King on the cover is very good. And this book is.

Although i want horror and spooky all month, what i *didnt* want was serial killers torturing victims, and I was a bit afraid when this story seemed to be heading in that direction. But it took a powerful and well-executed turn, and i think this will stick with me for a long time. 🐱

What really stuck with me is the idea that “monsters” very rarely look like what we expect them to. The weird guy you pass on the street? probably not a monster. But beware the nice looking, the people who seem to have no cracks in their outer presentation.

If you’ve ever wondered what it might be like inside the mind of someone with disassociative identity disorder (aka, multiple personalities) i’d bet this book will give you a pretty clear picture. DID is pretty well always prompted by severe childhood trauma, so be forewarned that’s something that comes with the territory in this story. 💔

By Jack Cheng
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Tagged: kid lit, adventure, mom lit, psychology, 21st century lit, funny, sci-fi
 
This funny, heartwarming adventure was an outstanding audiobook that my son and I enjoyed together. Almost-12-year-old Alex wants to launch his home built rocket into space and ends up launching himself into his own future. Alex is making a series of recordings for the aliens he thinks his rocket will encounter – a golden iPod to update alien life and build on what is contained in the golden record.
Charming. Smart. Thought-provoking. I loved it.
 
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
My 9 year old son’s review: “Stunning. It got really deep. The author did a really good job on this one. Five and a half stars.”

And Every Morning the Way Home Gets Longer and Longer 
By Fredrik Backman
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Tagged: 21st century lit, short story, psychology

It’s only an hour-long audiobook, and I bawled beginning at about minute 4 and continued throughout.

A man with Alzheimers recalls and recounts the precious moments of his life with his son, the ghost of his wife, and his grandson, Noah-Noah, whose name he likes twice as much as anyone else’s so he always says it twice (🥺😢😭 ).

It’s beautifully written and performed. It’ll hit home hard.

I do not recommend listening to it at work, where people can walk in your office and you have to explain that you’re fine but just listening to a sad book. Lol.

But i do recommend listening to it. ❤️

Interested in a Professional Book Review?

Contact SRD Editing Services
Posted on by — Leave a comment

Write like the Greats: Charles Bukowski

write-greats-bukowski
“Understand me.
I’m not like an ordinary world.
I have my madness,
I live in another dimension
and I do not have time for things
that have no soul.”

Writing like Bukowski

I don’t know much about Charles Bukowski. I know his reputation of being a … less-than-pleasant person. As Modest Mouse said, “God, who’d want to be such an asshole?“

But I know poetry (like ee cummings). I know good writing. Every now and then, I stumble across some writing from Bukowski, and it slaps me across the face. 

Bukowski’s writing is raw.

His style is known for being no-frills. Bare-bones. And somehow, as in this example, there is strength in his vulnerability. There is grit ground into his wounds that seem to have scarred over, but he has never forgotten. 

There is anger in these words. But is there not determination? And hope? And a promise for tomorrow? 

The Beginnings

Look at how he begins each line of this poem — as a bold statement about himself. A declaration of truth. 

First, he demands of the reader what they will do. An unapologetic demand that the reader do better, try something different — understanding. Then, he explains what he is (and is not) in a single line, and continues to tell the reader what he has and how he lives.

All these truths command the reader to follow his initial demand. You will understand the straightforwardness of his words, if nothing else. If you understand nothing of what he says, you know by the end what he thinks of you. 

The Last Word

Then, look at the last word of each line. Each thought ends on a noun. A thing. Something real that you can sink your teeth into. Each of these — me, world, madness, dimension, things — evokes an image. Evokes a texture, sound, or feeling. You can picture them in your mind, you could describe them to someone else if you needed to. 

And here is where Bukowski’s vulnerability comes to its head: he needs you to understand him. He needs you to hear what he has to say. Dismiss it when you’ve reached the end, if you want, but for a few sentences, he has made you do something different. He has made you think not only about him and what he is, but perhaps he has made you think about what and who you are as well. 

As tough as he may have appeared, Bukowski needed this connection. With you. He needed you to understand for a moment. And he does not ask this of you — he demands it. 

Bukowski Poetry Tip of the Day:

The heart of your poem (or even, your fiction) is what you’re demanding from your reader. Do not ask them for their attention — command it. Do not ask them to let you show your vulnerability, slice your heart open on the page and make it so they can’t look away. 

Because that is the soul of this poem, isn’t it? We all need to be understood. We all am things, have things, and live … but Bukowski reminds us that we do not have time. 

Contact Me

Want to talk about your poetry?

Posted on by — 2 Comments

Decision Making & Writing Your Novel

plan and outline your fiction novel by thinking through every decision

Planning your novel

You have an idea for a novel — that’s great. Now, putting together a plan for it can help you actually see it through and make it everything you hope it can be.

Planning a novel requires conscious decision making. You’re creating a world. You’re creating lives. You’re creating realities. It’s serious business. (Better put on your kill-em-dead lipstick now.)

One way to make decisions while outlining, designing characters, and choosing the aspects of your novel’s reality: consider the question that Jeff Bezos asks himself:

Is this a reversible or irreversible decision?

With this straightforward question, you should be able to help prioritize the decision-making and better structure your plot, themes, and symbolism.

If it’s a reversible decision . . .

Simple decisions can be made quickly and changed later if necessary. Can the decision be reversed? or altered, even? Then make it quickly and get on with whatever you’re writing.

For example: You want to write a scene where two lovers are having a spat a restaurant. You ask yourself, “Well, is it an Italian or Mexican restaurant?”

Does it matter to the plot of the story? Is it something you can tweak later? Then don’t trip. Pick one and write the scene with the appropriate details – delicious menu items, atmosphere, pertinent dialogue.

Now, be wary. Don’t begin writing off all questions with, “Well, I can always change this later.” You will begin to overcomplicate your plot, and multiple revisions can and will lead to inconsistencies.

If it’s an irreversible decision . . .

Decisions with lasting effects should be given some consideration and development. Will this decision affect the story in more ways than one? Will it somehow trigger a domino effect in a web of tangled plot threads that you don’t want to see unravel?

For example: You want a character to stand out for her looks because of a scar or birthmark on her face. Then, in one scene, you attempt to put her in disguise without mentioning how that distinguishing characteristic is covered. If no one recognizes her and she isn’t caught, the reader will see the plot hole.

Choosing a physical feature or personality trait for a character (or setting) is irreversible unless you show why that character has changed.

If you portray and describe a father-figure character as nurturing and receptive, that is an irreversible and defining characteristic that the reader will expect to stay consistent, unless given reason to believe in the change.

Choosing a profession, hobby, or area of expertise for a character carries its own burdens of verisimilitude. The reader will lose belief in your characters (and you) if they don’t seem to know much about their own job descriptions, the fashion of their profession, the details of their so-called interests, or the social discussions of topics they mention.

Don’t say a character is a veterinarian merely so your character can have “a job.” If you’re going to make your character a medical doctor of veterinary medicine – someone who has dedicated years of their life to the study and care of a range of animals – you need to show personality characteristics and lifestyle choices that align with that job.

There’s nothing like reading a character who is supposed to be a social worker, or cop, or a teacher, and being able to tell that the writer has no clue what someone in that profession does.

🌹 🌹 🌹

Editors make everything better. Contact me.  Get help with your writing decisions. 

Posted on by — 1 Comment

Write Like the Greats: ee cummings

writing poetry, fiction and nonfiction -- some grammar techniques

To show that you are one of the greats, you must first show that you know all the rules. You can’t break them, unless you’ve proven mastery over them.

A set of rules we all bemoan, but all continue to abide, are those dogmatic principles of punctuation. The sticky-and-unchangeable truths of indicating truths about words through capitalization and formations of dots on a page that convey these truths in touches to your psyche as subtle as a feather’s efforts to change your direction.

Think I’m being dramatic? Commas are argued over in court, and at least one man is said to have been “hanged on a comma” when the placement of this crucial punctuation mark contributed to his judges’ decision toward an execution. (I once had a teacher claim that the Vietnam War was “caused” by a poorly placed comma, but I can’t confirm this.)

All of which brings me to, perhaps, the greatest punctuation master of the last century: ee cummings.

While adhering to some of the most critical aspects of punctuation that convey meaning, cummings chose when and where to apply them, carefully. Like a painter enhancing the image with touches of gold leaf on the highlights. He ignored spacing where appropriate, used enjambment to his delight (it would seem), and de-emphasized the “proper” by equalizing all wording through use of entirely lower-case letters.

In one of my favorite of his poems, “i carry your heart with me (i carry it in” you can see this immediately, from the first letter. The “I” – the narrator – is instantly stripped away – placed on equal importance with the poem’s subject. Or, in grammatical terms, the subject of the sentence becomes equal with the object it acts upon. Seems strange that they both could be subjects, no?

“i carry your heart with me(i carry it in
my heart)i am never without it(anywhere
i go,you go,my dear,and whatever is done. . .“

From these lines, notice how his mastery connects the subjects – the “i” and the “you” – at every opportunity. Notice how there is no space, how there is constant connection of these equals. Notice how the parentheses – which should be used to interject thoughts in a complete sentence, like a side-whisper during a larger conversation – speak like an enhancement to the main narrative? Notice how they are placed in and around the central story?

cummings repeats this frequently. In this poem, and, of course, others. It’s a rumble in the middle of the message. A footnote too important to miss.

In his “Christmas Poem“, cummings uses the mighty parentheses only once, further emphasizing it as a schism.

After a stanza describing the “prodigious”, “gifted”, “humble”, “kneeling” images of worshipers to a “new babe” on this holy eve, cummings shatters the outward with a single punctuation mark that divides his mind from the surroundings:

“. . . humbly in their imagined bodies kneel
(over time space doom dream while floats the whole

perhapsless mystery of paradise)

mind without soul may blast some universe
to might have been,and stop ten thousand stars. . .“

His life has changed, in this moment. He has shown us how here, between the parentheses, there need be no commas, spaces, or words that exist outside. Only the words that need to be there are there.

It’s hard to put into words why ee cummings moves me so. His careful, yet seemingly carefree, use of the common linguistic rules that we all take for granted reads as a deep truth.

Perhaps, it’s best left to his own words. I present to you, the final stanza of “somewhere i have never traveled gladly beyond“:

“(i do not know what it is about you that closes
and opens;only something in me understands
the voice of your eyes is deeper than all roses)
nobody,not even the rain,has such small hands“

More of this stanza is within than without. The last line ends on what he would say to her, if he could know what it was. And notice – there is no period at the end. There is no “final stop” to this declaration of his love for her.

Oh! What punctuation can do to the heart.

🌹 🌹 🌹

Not so sure about your punctuation mastery? You’ve come to the right place. Contact me.